[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dirvish still a good choice?



Hi,

Dňa Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:01:21 -0400 Steve Litt
<slitt@troubleshooters.com> napísal:

> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:31:28 +0100
> Slavko <linux@slavino.sk> wrote:
> 
> > Dňa Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:22:07 -0700 Peter Michaux
> > <petermichaux@gmail.com> napísal:
> > 
> > > Looking at the Dirvish website [2] it seems that the project has
> > > been inactive since 2008. Perhaps Dirvish is such a simple layer
> > > over top of rsync that its been stable and hasn't needed attention
> > > in all this time.
> > 
> > I know nothing about Dirvish, but if any software works, there are
> > not needed the updates. 
> 
> Except security updates, if needed.

You are right, of course ;)

Initially i want to tell, that there can be no problem, if software is
old. But now, i see another thing - if someone want to start with the
new type of software, one need to consider, that "dead" software can be
usable for now, but:

+ there can be missing the security updates in future, but not all
  software need to be a NSA aware
+ there can be missing the libraries updates (if API will be changed) in
  future, then it can stop to work
+ there will not configuration changes in future, and then usage can
  boring :P (this is a joke)

Then, there is no problem to use old software, but i will not recommend
to start learn it and i suggest to find something actively developed.

regards

-- 
Slavko
http://slavino.sk

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: