[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: enough with the what's (not) on-topic discussions already



On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Larry Owens <owens@netptc.net> wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bret Busby [mailto:bret.busby@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2014 11:03 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: enough with the what's (not) on-topic discussions already
>
> On 24/11/2014, Curt <curty@free.fr> wrote:
>> On 2014-11-23, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
>>
>>> To any listmasters that might be paying attention.
>>>
>>
>> L'hôpital qui se moque de la charité?
>>
>>
>
> I think that, in one of the sciences, was a "L'Hopital's Rule", but, do not remember to what it applied, or, what was the rule.
>
> Otherwise, I wonder whether the above, has something to do with mosques and charities and hospitals?
>
>
> --
> Bret Busby
> Armadale
> West Australia
> ..............
>
> "So once you do know what the question actually is,  you'll know what the answer means."
> - Deep Thought,
>  Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
>  "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
>  A Trilogy In Four Parts",
>  written by Douglas Adams,
>  published by Pan Books, 1992
>
> ....................................................
> Not that it is relevant to the discussion but L'Hospitals

heh

> rule allows you to evaluate a function expressed as a ratio at a limit
> where both the numerator and the denominator tend to zero.

I think the zero is what has everyone -- on all sides -- worried.

> Larry

-- 
Joel Rees

... don't know what you'er expecting of me ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNnAvTTaJjM


Reply to: