Re: Why focus on systemd?
On Saturday 22 November 2014 16:03:54 Buntunub wrote:
> I
> certainly have no qualms about including Systemd in the next stable
> release, and I actually encourage it, so that people will have time to play
> with it and come to know and possibly even fall in love with it. I
> seriously do not understand why this needs to be rushed.
Systemd is available in the current stable, (see below) and people have had
time to play and fall in love with it (or not). So in how many Stable
versions of Linux are you saying that it should be available, before those
who wish to do so will have had long enough to play with it?
Lisi
lisi@Tux-II:~$ aptitude show systemd
Package: systemd
New: yes
State: not installed
Version: 44-11+deb7u4
Priority: extra
Section: admin
Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@debian.org>
Architecture: amd64
Uncompressed Size: 3,777 k
Depends: libacl1 (>= 2.2.51-8), libaudit0 (>= 1.7.13), libc6 (>= 2.11),
libcap2 (>=
2.10), libcryptsetup4 (>= 2:1.4), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), libkmod2
(>= 5~),
liblzma5 (>= 5.1.1alpha+20120614), libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1),
libselinux1 (>=
2.0.65), libsystemd-daemon0 (>= 31), libsystemd-id128-0 (>= 38),
libsystemd-journal0 (>= 38), libsystemd-login0 (>= 38), libudev0 (>=
172),
libwrap0 (>= 7.6-4~), util-linux (>= 2.19.1-2), initscripts (>=
2.88dsf-17),
udev
PreDepends: dpkg (>= 1.15.7.2)
Recommends: libpam-systemd
Suggests: systemd-gui, python, python-dbus, python-cairo
Conflicts: klogd, klogd, systemd
Breaks: lsb-base (< 4.1+Debian4), lsb-base (< 4.1+Debian4), lvm2 (<
2.02.84-1), lvm2 (<
2.02.84-1)
Description: system and service manager
systemd is a replacement for sysvinit. It is dependency-based and able to
read the LSB
init script headers in addition to parsing rcN.d links as hints.
It also provides process supervision using cgroups and the ability to not
only depend on
other init script being started, but also availability of a given mount point
or dbus
service.
Homepage: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
lisi@Tux-II:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
7.7
lisi@Tux-II:~$
Reply to: