Re: debian-advocacy?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:45:03PM +0200, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
> >> It seems that there's a lot of controversy about the SysV-replacement that
> >>should not be named. Most, if not all of the arguments for, as well as
> >>against seem to be of a philosophical, rather than stringent technichnical
> >>nature. As such, they are probably not suited for this list. So my question
> >>as a relative newcomer to the Debian ecosystem is if there is an -advocacy
> >>list, where the philosophical differences can be beaten into the ground,
> >>while keeping this list at a more factual level?
> >>
> >> If not, where do I propose the creation of such a list?
> >There already is one, but unfortunately no one is using it. :(
> >http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
> >
>
> So why, exactly, is the design philosophy and architecture of the Debian
> ecosystem not a legitimate topic for discussion among Debian users?
The description of the debian-user list seems to be a misnomer. Perhaps
it should read "Frontline support for users of the Debian Operating
System."?
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: