Re: debian-advocacy?
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:45:03 +0200
Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> wrote:
> It seems that there's a lot of controversy about the
> SysV-replacement that should not be named. Most, if not all of the
> arguments for, as well as against seem to be of a philosophical,
> rather than stringent technichnical nature. As such, they are
> probably not suited for this list.
The preceding sentence is not at all true. If Red Hat is using Debian
as its proxy in monopolizing Linux, and morphing Linux into something
completely different, this is the business of rank and file Debian
users.
> So my question as a relative
> newcomer to the Debian ecosystem is if there is an -advocacy list,
> where the philosophical differences can be beaten into the ground,
> while keeping this list at a more factual level?
You're not the first to propose such divide and conquer. Without a lot
of stringent moderation, it's not going to work.
> If not, where do I propose the creation of such a list?
It already exists: http://www.freelists.org/archive/modular-debian/
You can subscribe at http://www.freelists.org/list/modular-debian
Posting there does not preclude expressing systemd displeasure here.
SteveT
Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
Reply to: