[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)



On Vi, 26 sep 14, 11:03:07, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Joel Roth wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 05:01:03PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> >>On 09/25/2014 02:25 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
> >>
> >>>I would say that systemd takeover of major Linux distributions
> >>>and of Debian in particular would be a perfect subject
> >>>for Groklaw.
> >>How so?? Legally, Debian has the legal stance of a "Club". It is not a
> >>for-profit with Corporate Responsibilities towards share holders and/or the
> >>Government, who authorizes and spells out the said protections and
> >>responsibilities of a Legally Incorporated Corporation.
> >I was thinking in terms of journalism and analysis.
> >
> Actually, there is quite a bit of law and case law regarding "unincorporated
> associations" - which is technically what Debian is.  It has bylaws and
> officers.  And there's also Software in the Public Interest, which acts as
> fiscal agent.

In which jurisdiction?
http://www.debian.org/devel/developers.loc

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: