On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:22:02 +0200
François Patte <francois.patte@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
> Le 23/06/2014 17:22, Rodney D. Myers a écrit :
>
> which should be still similar in Debian 7. If you are new to RAID,
>
>
> So what HTH you says is the good way: create one partitions on each of
> your storages devices (say sdX1 and sdY1) then use the given command:
>
> # mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 \
> /dev/sdX1 /dev/sdY1
>
> Then format the created raid array
>
> # mkfs.ext4 /dev/md0
Did the above, 1.5 hours ago, was working diligently until a few
moments ago.
now this is what I see;
/sbin/mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Jun 25 16:03:44 2014
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 976630464 (931.39 GiB 1000.07 GB)
Used Dev Size : 976630464 (931.39 GiB 1000.07 GB)
Raid Devices : 3
Total Devices : 3
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Intent Bitmap : Internal
Update Time : Wed Jun 25 17:40:37 2014
State : active, degraded, resyncing
Active Devices : 1
Working Devices : 1
Failed Devices : 2
Spare Devices : 0
Resync Status : 6% complete
Name : riverside:0 (local to host riverside)
UUID : 22da3cb6:9c3b1aa0:8c8ba2c9:6c3cf76d
Events : 1145
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 33 0 active sync /dev/sdc1
1 8 49 1 faulty /dev/sdd1
2 8 65 2 faulty /dev/sde1
cat /proc/md0
cat: /proc/md0: No such file or directory
root@riverside:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid1]
md0 : active raid1 sde1[2](F) sdd1[1](F) sdc1[0]
976630464 blocks super 1.2 [3/1] [U__]
bitmap: 8/8 pages [32KB], 65536KB chunk
unused devices: <none>
--
Rodney D. Myers <rod_dmyers@fastmail.fm>
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Ben Franklin - 1759
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature