[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: raid/mdadm help



On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:47:18 -0600
Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> wrote:

> Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > it's been 3 hours since I attempted to create the raid array, and
> > it's stopped. This is what I see;
> > 
> > /sbin/mdadm --detail /dev/md0  
> 
> That was good information.  Additionally can you post the mdstat
> output?  It would be useful before rendering an opinion.
> 
>   cat /proc/mdstat
> 
> Bob

Ran all night, and same result

 /sbin/mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
        Version : 1.2
  Creation Time : Tue Jun 24 22:06:36 2014
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 1464763392 (1396.91 GiB 1499.92 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 488254464 (465.64 GiB 499.97 GB)
   Raid Devices : 4
  Total Devices : 4
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

  Intent Bitmap : Internal

    Update Time : Tue Jun 24 23:59:35 2014
          State : active, FAILED 
 Active Devices : 0
 Failed Devices : 4
  Spare Devices : 0

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 512K

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       0        0        0      removed
       2       0        0        2      removed
       4       0        0        4      removed
       6       0        0        6      removed

       0       8       17        -      faulty   /dev/sdb1
       1       8       33        -      faulty   /dev/sdc1
       2       8       49        -      faulty   /dev/sdd1
       4       8       65        -      faulty   /dev/sde1


cat /proc/mdstat 
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] 
md0 : active raid5 sde1[4](F) sdd1[2](F) sdc1[1](F) sdb1[0](F)
      1464763392 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2
[4/0] [____] bitmap: 0/4 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk

unused devices: <none>

-- 
Rodney D. Myers <rdmyers.42@gmail.com>

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
        Ben Franklin - 1759

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: