Re: preferred overlay/union filesystem?
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
> Well, I don't want to keep two separate files (that's what I'm trying to
> get away from). It seems like the overlay filesystem would be a bit
> cleaner if it can work, but symbolic links elsewhere would be my second
> choice.
>
As a variant of Kushal's suggestion of two symlinks to the same file,
you could have the real file in one place (preferably where it's
written to) and a symlink to it from the other place.
ChrisA
Reply to: