Re: FSF condemns partnership between Mozilla and Adobe to support Digital Restrictions Management
Le 19/05/2014 13:20, Jerry Stuckle a écrit :
> On 5/19/2014 6:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 5/19/14, Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> wrote:
>>> On 19/05/14 20:43, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>>>>> A more relevant request: how about an example of a digital (or any)
>>>>>> recording that was released _with_DRM_ for which the copyright
>>>>>> has now
>>>>>> lapsed?
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_mouse_law
>>>
>>> Isn't that the reverse? Mickey Mouse, when first released was not
>>> subject to DRM, and copyright (due to the above law) has not lapsed.
>>
>> Yes. Exactly. And the point being, the copyright moguls achieve
>> endless extensions due to their parliamentary $ influence, so there's
>> a good chance you will never get such an example as the one you ask
>> for - due to ever-increasing copyright extensions.
>>
>> At least, in the good ole U.S of A.
>>
>>
>
> Whether you like it or not, that is the law. Period.
>
> Jerry
>
>
1) One can say that one disapprove a law, it's called democracy
2) When lawmakers are paid to orient what they do this is usually called
corruption.
Reply to: