[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re^2: Mutt: SSL Certificate check ... SASL authentication failed



References: <[🔎] 2b8c71ec0272453c696df1a5d4ad9c87.squirrel@easthope.ca>
<[🔎] 53115869.3090502@gmail.com>

From: Scott Ferguson <scott.ferguson.debian.user@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 14:47:53 +1100
> Shouldn't that certificate be for domain from which you are mailing?
> e.g. *.easthope.ca

Why?  The only configuration given to mutt was the four lines
mentioned.  The response from mutt was quoted without change;
except that I put the second "=== ... ===" ahead of the last
two lines rather than after.  The report ends with these lines.

WARNING: Server hostname does not match certificate

-- Mutt: SSL Certificate check (certificate 2 of 2 in chain)
SASL authentication failed
================================

My interpretation is that mutt, or SASL on behalf of mutt, got
a certificate from websitewelcome.  That certificate is authenticated
by a root certificate from COMODO.  SASL found that the name in the
root certificate doesn't match the name of the server which sent it.
Is that wrong?

Thanks,                 ... Peter E.

-- 
Telephone 1 360 639 0202.  Bcc: peter at easthope.ca "http://carnot.yi.org/ "



Reply to: