Re: terminal emulator compatible with Ecma-48
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: terminal emulator compatible with Ecma-48
- From: Chris Davies <chris@roaima.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 00:28:59 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] rm065axkmu.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk>
- References: <532d1c3ff3b024f5b98bc18439ae3a45@neutralite.org> <o9pv4axkll.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> <l3BI5-56P-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <317dbada-3dc8-45bf-86cf-a9665c5885b5@googlegroups.com> <d6135axr3u.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> <l43O3-67k-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <ce1c884f-13ef-46b9-ae99-297adb777376@googlegroups.com>
Thomas Dickey <dickey@his.com> wrote:
> On Monday, April 29, 2013 5:30:03 PM UTC-4, Chris Davies wrote:
>> Thomas Dickey <dickey@his.com> wrote:
>> > What I recall of the PuTTY FAQ (a specific pointer would help) is that
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/faq.html
> that's not what I meant by "specific".
A misunderstanding, then.
> You stated that
>> I'd extend that to suggest that most terminal emulators support the
>> majority of VT220 sequences, not just the VT100 subset.
This is my opinion.
> and
>> The PuTTY FAQ seems to claim that it's either implemented everything
>> or else documented what it hasn't implemented. This might be a good
>> starting point.
> Noting where PuTTY claims/documents the "everything" would be helpful.
Section A.2 of the FAQ I posted, "Features supported in PuTTY".
Chris
Reply to: