Re: Maximum RAM

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Maximum RAM
From: Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:41:38 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 52A968B2.7010800@groessler.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20131212083210.40a38a273ed66e487fc8282e@6jf.be>
References: <[🔎] 3e7da98ccb68b6bc774019ca7e66bf00371028d7@sitemail.hostway.com> <[🔎] 52A95C5D.3070808@gmail.com> <[🔎] 52A961BE.2000708@guntner.com> <[🔎] 20131212083210.40a38a273ed66e487fc8282e@6jf.be>

On 12/12/13 08:32, Jean-Marc wrote:

Like PailNM said, not implemented in Microsoft O/S.



How come, everyone is thinking so?

Of course, it's implemented.

regards,
chris

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maximum RAM
  - From: PaulNM <debian@paulscrap.com>

References:
- Maximum RAM
  - From: erosenberg@hygeiabiomedical.com
- Re: Maximum RAM
  - From: Scott Ferguson <scott.ferguson.debian.user@gmail.com>
- Re: Maximum RAM
  - From: David Guntner <david@guntner.com>
- Re: Maximum RAM
  - From: Jean-Marc <jean-marc@6jf.be>

Prev by Date: Re: Xfce config question
Next by Date: Re: sudo security Was: Reporting missing package during install
Previous by thread: Re: Maximum RAM
Next by thread: Re: Maximum RAM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread