[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Libreoffice4 in wheezy? Several questions



On Du, 19 mai 13, 11:39:30, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I wanted to install LO4 in wheezy. I wondered, why it is in wheezy-backports 
> but not in testing. Maybe the packages in wheezy-backports are too young for 
> testing? 
> 
> However, I managed it by using aptitude and made sure, all dependencies are 
> correct.
> 
> But I guess, there is an easier way, to update my ONLY my installed packages 
> out of wheezy. In the wiki I read, you can use apt-get -t wheezy-backports 
> install $package, which worked well.
 
Not sure what you mean here, could you please rephrase/elaborate?

> And of course, i can edit the apt pinning system to give wheezy-backports a 
> higher ranking. But wouldn't this affect other packages, too?

Yes it would and it isn't necessary, the defaults should work fine.

> I suppose, there might be a way just to update certain packages from wheezy-
> backports using the pinning system, but I fear, I can use this only for meta-
> packages or directly named packages. Please correct me, if I am wrong.

In the default configuration packages that you choose to install from 
backports (via -t) will be kept updated, but no other packages from 
backports will be installed. Does this answer your question?

> And last question: If Libreoffice4 will be put into testing repo, will those 
> packages then be newer than those in wheezy-backports or is this a matter of 
> chance?

Normally a package has to be in testing first and only then backported 
(to ensure some testing). The package in backports has a special version 
so that apt/dpkg always consider the package in testing to be newer 
(even if the software itself is at the same version).

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: