Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
From: Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:02:33 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] k9kvpn$ls7$2@ger.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAOdo=Szn5jFFx6VHL-F1V=ysWbYWuSsOTtG6XFQmBGvvxXUXGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <k98m1m$lob$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAOdo=Swm4L4xuxGsz2p_7DW2KZwh078qOC7Z_7q6XY5VP-9_0Q@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] k9frvk$feb$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] CAOdo=Sx0a3wmbDv4ZCUTvUp61xCfDp9DthFkp-6FoK1ctov5JA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] k9g0hj$j0f$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] k9ihin$ave$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] CAOdo=Szn5jFFx6VHL-F1V=ysWbYWuSsOTtG6XFQmBGvvxXUXGw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi there


Tom H wrote:

AFAIUI, "$remote_fs" being "Required-Start" for bind9 means that nfs
volumes have to be mounted for bind9 to be started not that
nfs-kernel-server's shares have to be exported.


This box does both.


Regards,
Rob

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
  - From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
  - From: Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl>
- Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
  - From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
- Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
  - From: Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl>
- Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
  - From: Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl>
- Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
  - From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
Next by Date: Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
Previous by thread: Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
Next by thread: Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread