Re: aptitude changelog gives "You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list"
On Wed, 23 May 2012 14:50:21 +0000 (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message
<[🔎] jpitfd$kr$12@dough.gmane.org>:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 00:13:20 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:36:51 +0000 (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message
> > <[🔎] jpgirj$isf$17@dough.gmane.org>:
> >
> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:26:49 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC), Camaleón wrote in
> >> > message <[🔎] jpgddv$isf$10@dough.gmane.org>:
> >> >
> >> >> Yes, the one listed in Debian BTS that handles the OP's issue
> >> >> (see $subject). Thanks :-)
> >> >
> >> > ..you too have been here long enough now to not trust those too
> >> > far. ;o)
> >>
> >> Sorry, but no bug number means there's no real bug: before we can
> >> call it "a bug" we have to prove there's a problem ;-)
> >
> > ..aye, I was referring to your over-reliance on what you called
> > "$subject", you have not only seen, how wildly some of these threads
> > morph everywhere else than what each OP asks etc for.
>
> But the question is valid, the message is present so then, can we
> consider the $subject a bug or a feature?
..that probably depends on the usefulness of your definition
of "$subject". ;o)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: