Re: OT: More about GPG signing
On Thu, 10 May 2012 19:18:53 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:07 +0000, Camaleón wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012
> 17:45:22 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:14 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> >> Alternatively, should I just ignore the signature, in which case
> why is
>> >> the sender polluting the list with useless crap?
>> >
>> > That's the problem.
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> And what's _what you think_ the problem is?
>>
>> The problem here is that users *don't understand* what a GPG/PGP
>> signature is.
>>
> Or some do fake that they are dummies, while they aren't?!
If it talks like a dummy, writes like a dummy and looks like a dummy...
it's because it's a dummy.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: