[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: More about GPG signing



On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:45:22 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:14 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> Alternatively, should I just ignore the signature, in which case why is
>> the sender polluting the list with useless crap?
> 
> That's the problem.

(...)

And what's _what you think_ the problem is?

The problem here is that users *don't understand* what a GPG/PGP 
signature is.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


Reply to: