09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: >> Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not >> You waste our time and bandwidth. > > In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures > are valid. > >> Bob's key validates his identity - yours does not. >> I can verify that "Bob" is "Bob" through a chain of trust. > > Why does Mikka's not? It's not impossible for someone to have a trust > path to Mikka. Albeit one step removed, since the signing key he uses > has one signature, from another of his keys - but that one has at > least one. (I haven't managed to construct a trust path to Mikka > myself, since most of the public pathfinder servers don't have his > key) > > Because nobody else near Kotka, Finland uses PGP and the nearest CAcert assurers are after 110KMs from me. PS. I am back to weird long signatures. I won't comment to this thread anymore nor to anything else which I haven't written in my signature or elsewhere. -- [Mika Suomalainen](https://mkaysi.github.com/) || [gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728](http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/key.txt) || [Why do I sign my emails?](http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/WhyDoISignEmails.html) || [Please don't send HTML.](http://mkaysi.github.com/articles/complaining/HTML.html) || [Please don't toppost](http://mkaysi.github.com/articles/complaining/topposting.html) || [This signature](https://gist.github.com/2643070) ||
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature