Re: [OT] Posting styles
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [OT] Posting styles
- From: Indulekha <indulekha@theunworthy.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:05:31 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120411160531.GA9859@radhesyama>
- In-reply-to: <iP7XX-55e-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
- References: <iNNRE-26O-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNNRE-26O-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNNRE-26O-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNNRE-26O-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNNRE-26O-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNNRE-26O-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNNRE-26O-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNNRE-26O-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNNRE-26O-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP7XX-55e-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In linux.debian.user, Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote:
[note: obnoxious superfluous quoting not edited out,for the sake of
illustration]
>
> --H4SyuGOnfnj3aJqJ
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Sb, 07 apr 12, 18:52:08, Indulekha wrote:
>>=20
>> No downside at all then, eh?=20
>
> Mutt used to have a flea (bug) that would incorrectly set=20
> disposition=3Dinline on pgp/mime attachments, but Joey seems to be using a=
>=20
> fixed version.
>
> Unless you went out of your way to include the signature in the reply=20
> there is a bug somewhere that needs to be fixed.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
> --=20
> Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
>
> --H4SyuGOnfnj3aJqJ
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
> Content-Description: Digital signature
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPhaePAAoJEHNWs3jeoi3pv8wH/jBwOVbpsOpY8C8kIfK6qB/2
> HksLeGTu58WTUAhFX+gUMLwfd1qEeoMzmhFlRTvKWzM+DESum4CmIM+H6ZsT1b8F
> PQ5/ftrSIXQNxfvUY6Kr5YmVZSbePmwphZ6QfNuvpf8T2dTD7Mf2PRsznBZLHNMM
> aOBEZ9r8NjhJxr0Y/LjejpGt6Ux2GKRNn+yL1exawOgsBnYKbRJl6PJKMkoiPlW1
> lO+1A9i7dLoIy3vsYS0CEcXKB/zoe1A4Rk9ja9yh6jnN2v1C9OzJfWBG+xNXyk0X
> s1IErnhtnMNDJyMAZkbybdF3DLn8T5k2iME4/6EO264v4YCg6wb3LI/sRveVJ6g=
> =3v4i
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --H4SyuGOnfnj3aJqJ--
>
>
What you see is what I get after hitting "reply".
Using mutt-patched from stable (1.5.20-9+squeeze2). Will it be
better if I build the latest version of mutt from source then?
I'd surely rather not wade through all the garbage I currently
see when people insist on using those pgp/gpg sigs.
--
❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Indulekha
Reply to: