Chris Bannister wrote:
[Please trim your posts on this mailing list] On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:14:34AM -0400, PMA wrote:I'm not sure "utterly" is quite the word. Nobody in signing thinks a signature is needed to identify him.You're not confusing the cryptographic signature with the normal email signature, are you?
I was, yes. And I am still not clear as to how this topic relates to the typed-in as opposed to the auto-append.