Re: Icedove and Enigmail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01.04.2012 19:30, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> On 01/04/12 15:00, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:07:48 +0300, Matthias Andersson wrote:
>>
>>> The latest version of enigmail isn't compatible with icedove
>>> 3.1.16. Is there a version that will work or another extension
>>> that will perform the same task (gpg encryption)?
>>
>> In what way "incompatible"? Are you getting an error? I would
>> report it in Debian BTS.
>>
>> Mmmm, now I say...
>>
>> enigmail: Enigmime Service not available
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665712
>>
>> enigmail: version 1.0.1-5 does not work with icedove 8.0
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664427
> I am using Icedove 10.0.3 and enigmail 2:1.4-1. Maybe youse guys
> should upgrade. -- Sian Mountbatten siduction user
>
>
I am using Icedove 10.0.3-3 and Enigmail 2:1.4-1 too.
% lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid)
Release: unstable
Codename: sid
I think that it's safe to upgrade those two packages from Sid (but I
am not fully sure and do it with your own responsibility...).
http://packages.debian.org/sid/icedove
http://packages.debian.org/sid/enigmail
- --
Mika Suomalainen
> gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
> 4DB53CFE82A46728 Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65
> 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
>> NOTE: The old key (62FE66853913CB03) expires on 03.04.2012!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=Dnuu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: