Re: [OT] Ownership of words

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Ownership of words
From: Lisi <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 01:22:19 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 201201090122.19433.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAAr43iNi510TDRc1aKMiYX8iW=qeRF8Tnkn3SvTrr3NG3FbYow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 4F0889E1.7@gmail.com> <[🔎] 201201081338.58606.lisi.reisz@gmail.com> <[🔎] CAAr43iNi510TDRc1aKMiYX8iW=qeRF8Tnkn3SvTrr3NG3FbYow@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday 09 January 2012 00:11:09 Joel Rees wrote:
> (Although I have to wonder why this topic is okay, but some others are
> not.)

I get the distinct impression that some people think that it isn't!

Lisi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Ownership of words
  - From: John Jason Jordan <johnxj@comcast.net>

References:
- Vodafone Mobile Internet modem
  - From: Panayiotis Karabassis <panayk@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT] Ownership of words
  - From: Lisi <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT] Ownership of words
  - From: Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: dhclient renewal
Next by Date: Re: Which development and image libraries needed to build emacs-24
Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Ownership of words
Next by thread: Re: [OT] Ownership of words
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread