[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Current user friendly documentation of Debian repository structure and use???



songbird wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
...

   ages ago i used a straight copy from the
DVDs for lenny to set up what sounds like
what you want to do.  get a copy of the
DVDs onto a faster hard drive.

   wish i had perfect memory, but i think
i just used a simple recursive copy
cp -ra [src] [target]

   if you have USB 3 this should be faster
than what i went through.

   i'm not sure if i had to link some
files/directories after that copy to get
apt-get and synaptic to be happy, but it
did work and i used those copies until
squeeze hit testing.

   i had entries in /etc/apt/sources.list that
looked like:

deb file:/mb/debian/lenny/cdrom01/ lenny contrib main
deb file:/mb/debian/lenny/cdrom02/ lenny contrib main
deb file:/mb/debian/lenny/cdrom03/ lenny contrib main
deb file:/mb/debian/lenny/cdrom04/ lenny contrib main
deb file:/mb/debian/lenny/cdrom05/ lenny contrib main

   i haven't had to do anything like this since
then so i'm not sure if it would work for
squeeze/wheezy.

   you may need an entry in /etc/apt/apt.conf that
looks like:

APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated "true";

to avoid having to set up authentication stuff...
[don't run normally with this option set]

   if anything just try to copy the first dvd and
see what happens and what error messages come
out of apt-get or synaptic and go from there.

   ls /dvd01 if you have the first dvd mounted
to /dvd01 should give you the top directories
and then you can look further down in from
there to see how it looks.


   songbird




i've suspected as much  *LOL* ;/
For the record
  - I'm contemporary of parents of Linus Torvalds
  - I've been tempted to ask
if Debian (any version) is more powerful/versatile than CPM-80
         Which has more obtuse documentation, CPM-80 or Debian

I've set "Reply To" to debian-user@lists.debian.org
For those wising to discuss issues personally, my "From:" address is valid, if well filtered ;)



Reply to: