Re: Standard for soft return by automatic word and line wrap
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:37:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Camaleón :)
>
> yes, I'm using Evolution, but if I quote from GUI mailers such as
> Evolution, Thunderbird or OTOH from text based mailers such as Mutt and
> Wanderlust, the quotes usually look okay, quoting the friends Alpine or
> your Pan looks disgusting.
I only have problems whith quotes when replying to some posts that used
Kmail because of an annoying bug that hit a specific version of the MUA.
And also have problems with some formats used by webmails (mainly Hotmail
and Yahoo!) but those are an exception not the rule.
>> > I also wonder if there are any light weighted editors able to do no
>> > automatic line wrap for programming and to do automatic line wrap,
>> when
>> > using them for non-program-code-text.
>>
>> I guess that many (Gedit, for instance).
>
> Yes, but I won't call Gedit "light weight".
It is, if you have GNOME already installed.
> I'm thinking of something like Leafpad. FWIW I won't use vi(m), nano,
> emacs etc., it should be a GUI editor.
Choose your poison:
http://wiki.debian.org/TextEditor#Graphical
And I have to add jEdit.
>> > PS:
>> >
>>
12345678-1-2345678-2-2345678-3-2345678-4-2345678-5-2345678-6-2345678-7-2
>> > new line
>>
>> It renders and is handled fine in my newsreader.
>>
>> Now I will force a long line (>72 characters):
>>
>>
123456789-123456789-123456789-123456789-123456789-123456789-123456789-123456789-123456789
>
> This line is ok, just the quoted text is borked.
Well, I can see something wrong in your quotes. Have you tried to reply
to my post from Thunderbird?
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: