[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [LAU] OnDemand-performance was(OT: klang)

On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 21:14 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:18:23PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 00:22 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:34:03AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > every email address in the mail is shown as is, so at least respect
> > > > the privacy of others and remove email addresses, or much better,
> > > 
> > > If you post to a mailing list, there *is* no privacy.
> > 
> > There are different levels of "privacy", at least mailman archives will
> > hide the email addresses and some e.g.
> > http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org only
> > allows to read the archive, when you're subscribed.
> But you are on Debian mailing list.  It is all public...
> Mailing list is meant to be public.
> Osamu

Yes and for me it's ok. I don't use a nickname and I only have one email
address. In this case it was my fault to cross-post. I should have asked
the Debian list for current Debian scripts regarding to ondemand at
startup and then report it at Linux audio users, instead of

However, many people still won't their email address shown in the
Internet, at least they want something like me-myself-and-i(AT)mars.org.

I'll experienced that today I get less "classic" spam (Viagra, Gucci, I
need your PIN and TANs to give you a 1000000$ present), even with my
email address published, than "new" spam, such as all those inventions
to http://www.linkedin.com/ or I subscribed myself to something that in
the first place seems to be engagé, but after a while it emerged to be
from conspiracy theorists or what ever kind of people.


Reply to: