[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [LAU] OnDemand-performance was(OT: klang)



On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 21:14 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:18:23PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 00:22 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:34:03AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > every email address in the mail is shown as is, so at least respect
> > > > the privacy of others and remove email addresses, or much better,
> > > 
> > > If you post to a mailing list, there *is* no privacy.
> > 
> > There are different levels of "privacy", at least mailman archives will
> > hide the email addresses and some e.g.
> > http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org only
> > allows to read the archive, when you're subscribed.
> 
> But you are on Debian mailing list.  It is all public...
> 
> Mailing list is meant to be public.
> 
> Osamu

Yes and for me it's ok. I don't use a nickname and I only have one email
address. In this case it was my fault to cross-post. I should have asked
the Debian list for current Debian scripts regarding to ondemand at
startup and then report it at Linux audio users, instead of
cross-posting.

However, many people still won't their email address shown in the
Internet, at least they want something like me-myself-and-i(AT)mars.org.

I'll experienced that today I get less "classic" spam (Viagra, Gucci, I
need your PIN and TANs to give you a 1000000$ present), even with my
email address published, than "new" spam, such as all those inventions
to http://www.linkedin.com/ or I subscribed myself to something that in
the first place seems to be engagé, but after a while it emerged to be
from conspiracy theorists or what ever kind of people.

Regards,
Ralf


Reply to: