On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:38:12PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I'm confused, will Debian or will Debian not switch to systemd? As far as I'm aware, there are no plans to switch to systemd at the moment. There are discussions about the possibility of that happening, but at the moment there are problems with systemd that stop it from being the default init system. If those problems are fixed, then systemd MAY become the default - though there may come a better alternative in the mean time. This, of course, doesn't preclude systemd being an alternative init system (which it already is. systemd is installable and usable and many packages are adding support for it). > > ------- Forwarded message ------- > From: "Ralf Mardorf" > To: "General Discussion about Arch Linux" > Subject: Re: [arch-general] My end-user $0.02 on /etc/rc.conf splitting. > Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:25:40 +0200 > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:54:08 +0200, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia wrote: > > >On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:57:46PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >>> Is debian switching > >> > >>That remains to be seen. > > > >If Debian intends to continue support for Hurd and > >KfreeBSD they can't move to systemd -- which relies > >on Linux kernel features to work. > > > >That debian has a disincentive is not the same as > >Arch having a disincentive, tho'. > > > >I would rather we use DJB's daemontools as process 1 > >but I know exactly how these arguments tend to go. > > http://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Installation > We talked about it on Debian mailing list, IICR Debian will switch, but I > might be mistaken. > - Ralf > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.orgwith a > subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmaster@lists.debian.org > Archive: [🔎] op.whx45yq4qhadp0@suse11-2">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] op.whx45yq4qhadp0@suse11-2 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature