[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Thunderbird 12.01 problem under Debian Sid



On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:46:46 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

> On 26/06/12 11:54 AM, Camaleón wrote:

(...)

>>> (thunderbird-bin:2386): GLib-GObject-WARNING **:
>>> /build/buildd-glib2.0_2.32.3-1-i386-987P8N/glib2.0-2.32.3/./gobject/gsignal.c:3393:
>>> signal name `selection_changed' is invalid for instance `0x9f94baf0'
>>>
>>>
>> For the type of message it seems to be related to the glib library.
>> Anyway, 12.x is now old ;-), have you considered an update to the
>> latest version available (now 13.0.1)?
> 
>    Sorry...first time it went private :)

Grrr! I just saw it.

(no problem ;-P)

>    Minutes after I wrote the above Thunderbird prompted me to DL
> 13.0.1....so I did. No change still getting pages of the messages.

Bad news then :-(
 
>> Google returned this:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738549
>>
>> Not sure if it could have any link with your problem, though.
> 
> 
>    Must have missed that one....it sure sounds like my problem. 

The above error looks similar to yours but the report is for Firefox, 
I may have overlooked the first time, sorry. Anyway, see if you can 
trigger the message warning when you open the address book, as it says 
the bug reporter.

> Wonder why no one else is reporting it?

I don't know... I'm more than used to see all sorts of mozilla warnings 
and errors in my "~/.xsession-errors" file, though I'm using lenny:

(thunderbird:3457): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_clipboard_set_with_data: assertion `targets != NULL' failed
(thunderbird:3457): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_clipboard_set_with_data: assertion `targets != NULL' failed
(thunderbird:3457): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_clipboard_set_with_data: assertion `targets != NULL' failed

> For a while Firefox was doing something similar. but that has now
> stopped.

Yes, they came and go, that's why I never bother (unless I were 
experiencing another visible problem, of course).

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


Reply to: