Re: something about slurm-llnl
On 2012-06-15, Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
>> >> It's for linux clusters, so I would say unless you're running or are
****************************
>> >> part of a linux cluster, which doesn't seem to be the case, you
>> > ***********************
>> > According to previous posts by this person you are incorrect.
I didn't and haven't read any and all of the other thread(s) the op has
participated in, the urls of some of which you have been kind enough to
spend your time digging up for me, in which she makes it clear she's
clustered.
Reply to: