[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dd_rescue No additional sense



On 14/06/12 07:34 PM, KS wrote:
> On 14/06/12 03:25 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>
>> I will second keith's suggestion to use gddrescue which has somewhat
>> improved behavior and might work better.  I pretty much have switched
>> to using it whenever I need to do this.
>>
> 
> Running it now. Waiting to see if it works any better.
> 

It could only read around 44GB (dd_rescue read around 52).

dd'ing first two partitions now to disk.

/KS


Reply to: