On 14/06/12 07:34 PM, KS wrote: > On 14/06/12 03:25 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: >> >> I will second keith's suggestion to use gddrescue which has somewhat >> improved behavior and might work better. I pretty much have switched >> to using it whenever I need to do this. >> > > Running it now. Waiting to see if it works any better. > It could only read around 44GB (dd_rescue read around 52). dd'ing first two partitions now to disk. /KS