Re: gpg/pgp noise
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
08.05.2012 14:57, Indulekha kirjoitti:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:53:30PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> 08.05.2012 14:45, Jochen Spieker kirjoitti:
>>>> Indulekha:
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I think you may have an incorrect or incomplete
>>>>> configuration....
>>>>
>>>> This is inline vs. MIME:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.phildev.net/pgp/pgp_clear_vs_mime.html
>>>>
>>>> J.
>
> And that page forgets the problems in MIME.
>
> PGP/MIME requires headers, message and the signature.asc to be
> verified. Some mailing list programs mess up with the headers and
> this way make PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
>
> In INLINE, the signature is in message and it doesn't require
> headers to be verified so it's harder to be messed up by mailing
> list software.
>
>>
>
> Well, all I know is that Jochen Spieker is able to use it without
> being intrusive.... Maybe you should try to follow his example? :)
If I used PGP/MIME, my signatures couldn't be verified on Ubuntu
mailing lists (I am on 5 of them if I recall correctly), nor Enigmail
mailing list nor gnupg-user mailing lists nor many others. This is
small list of those MLs, which I mean with
http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/Clearsigning.html .
- --
Mika Suomalainen
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728
Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
http://mkaysi.github.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=Kx3T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: