[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gpg/pgp noise



On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:43:11PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 08.05.2012 14:40, Indulekha kirjoitti:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:34:02PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote: On
> > 08/05/12 12:29, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> >>>> 08.05.2012 14:20, Lisi kirjoitti:
> >>>>> On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may
> >>>>> alleviate your problem but it's more than likely to be
> >>>>> people haven't exported their key.
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Mine has been exported. See how you view that one.
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Thanks, Phil. After adding the keyserver Mika
> >>>>>>> suggested, I no longer see the error messages but do
> >>>>>>> still have to see this messy block of text
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> at the end:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> But did you after Phil's?
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Lisi
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> That signature block informs to be bad signature from Phil.
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Viestin sisennettyä osaa (vastausta) on luultavasti
> >>>>> muokattu
> >>>> (In English: The indented part of message (reply) has been 
> >>>> possibly changed)
> >>>>> gpg -komento ja -tuloste:
> >>>> In English: gpg -command and -output:
> >>>>> /usr/bin/gpg2 gpg: Signature made ti  8. toukokuuta 2012 
> >>>>> 13.53.22 EEST using RSA
> >>>> key ID A093C263
> >>>>> gpg: BAD signature from "Phil Dobbin
> >>>>> <bukowskiscat@gmail.com>"
> > 
> > That's because the email client didn't snip the quoted previous 
> > message correctly therefore part of the original signature was
> > still included.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Phil...
> > 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > No, I think you may have an incorrect or incomplete
> > configuration....
> > 
> 
> Phil is right, that security error came, because you wrote your
> message between content, which he had signed.
> 
> Enigmail automatically removes signatures of other people when
> replying to signed message.
> 
> - -- 
> Mika Suomalainen
> gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728
> Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A  AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
> http://mkaysi.github.com/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPqQbNAAoJEE21PP6CpGcovIEP/jcm0+kccXOLhjC1sv7bvECr
> f/c1j6w8EFv2XmYdW1VPSQ2U8bGD3XgguuuRh12eG3M7udz0iaaSs0UBENHmLZpc
> VrvYwXJ42VVRm1Wrm56Ta/v4SftBO0kbwrgkzqPrsptlboqUbQRE9XCGrgV4kKVM
> zFgle9YWKP1bDHdJs9VyCUYDjg4BPei3NthBltGjIxmHXbj0OCqzlhh552eVLbi3
> JRRjDtZ9ettTW9BgULNNdBhbI3PqZWVKpEjjc9J9DB+6XXjwS5Mf1JhT6WHlSYJl
> 5fEbjRw6Og7pzU21gVC2Zhsi5LqzM8dIZyvndExtHsD3cC6/JDd4TDQEaJE8JilJ
> wMrUfZ0DXTYhhrpv/zEaAogPkJi8uBlx6jtDsMCvn4NiIX34OtVTRLLZ75Tu0lz4
> bpLto68jzhIEKuhAAnTn0teQVTtjCl5bnwVYdAyWTwCSgnkVEy27WgwyMDtklx/Z
> lOhrlZIQG/IBiNA47N6QUBZHm0KDNsfB3TICiY7tczkSFRFbBeguPWXe2mJhGRfD
> vxuZ8cXLnsZ0fPWprSZ7oY0GdPfloWJ4Ckvs8b0RtavB62F7XNNtF4/V36JLI54b
> TBbbzASLy92PPPGXYZ1vG/WKFWd0CqWb1G59yu5CG9QWw/efRkDSoQp416/cNOGA
> S33PPm5VnVuLsJXWf8J/
> =qHVs
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

I despise thunderchicken, and will not be using enigmail.
It seems to me hardly anyone who uses gpg does so correctly...

-- 
❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤   
 Indulekha 


Reply to: