Re: OT: Broken digest - was another thread
- To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: OT: Broken digest - was another thread
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 18:15:54 +0200
- Message-id: <1336320954.2213.75.camel@oz.(null)>
- In-reply-to: <1336320657.2213.62.camel@oz.(null)>
- References: <1336320657.2213.62.camel@oz.(null)>
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 18:10 +0200, an unknown sender wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 04:41:31PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 16:32 +0200, an unknown sender wrote:
> > > On Sun, 06 May 2012 12:48:40 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > >
> > > (...)
> > >
> > > (your posts still come with broken "References" and "In-Reply-To" fields.
> >
> > I copy the subject and add the mailing list address. I can't edit the
> > header and the admin still hasn't repaired the digest.
> >
>
> The admin will not "repeair the digest", this as been going on
> for like a decade -- please subscribe the normal way if you care about
> not breaking threading, this problem will not be going away.
It's broken since some days. I guess you're referring to another issue,
that can cause that e.g. references aren't correct, e.g. if a user
replies to the complete digest instead of an independent mail of the
digest.
- Ralf
Reply to: