Re: Is 1600x1200 screen better than 1440x900?
On 2012-04-25 09:13:35 -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> I replaced my old 21" CRT (I had been running it at 1792x1344x32@75hz) in
> favour of a 24" LED monitor running at 1920x1080. That's a drop of .4M
> pixels but the really high resolution LCD screens cost a lot more.
Unfortunately the loss in vertical resolution is more important than
the number of pixels for viewing PDF files in portrait orientation,
unless you have a rotatable second monitor just for that.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Reply to: