Re: Is 1600x1200 screen better than 1440x900?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Sian Mountbatten <poenikatu@fastmail.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Is 1600x1200 screen better than 1440x900?
From: "Hans-J. Ullrich" <hans.ullrich@loop.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:03:42 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 201204242003.44679.hans.ullrich@loop.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] jn6oh6$e8p$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <[🔎] jn6oh6$e8p$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Am Dienstag, 24. April 2012 schrieb Sian Mountbatten:
> When I replaced my desktop with a new computer, I kept my TFT screen. It
> has the non-standard size of 1440x900.
> 
> Recently, I have been wondering if it would be better for me to have
> 1600x1200 screen. Would this be better for Linux software? What about HD
> TV? And movies?
> 
> Any comments welcome

TFT should be used in its native resolution. Doing so, you get the sharpest 
screen.

I recommend to use 1440x900 resolution and adjust icon size, fonts etc to your 
needs.

Regards

Hans

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is 1600x1200 screen better than 1440x900?
  - From: daniel jimenez <daniel.jimenez.gomez@gmail.com>

References:
- Is 1600x1200 screen better than 1440x900?
  - From: Sian Mountbatten <poenikatu@fastmail.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Is 1600x1200 screen better than 1440x900?
Next by Date: Re: Is 1600x1200 screen better than 1440x900?
Previous by thread: Is 1600x1200 screen better than 1440x900?
Next by thread: Re: Is 1600x1200 screen better than 1440x900?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread