Re: When will Debian 7.0 with Linux Kernel 3.x be Released?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It seems that you sent this email directly to me and not to the list.
I presume that this happened by accident.
I have used both Ubuntu and Debian Sid and according to my experience,
Sid is usually more stable than Ubuntu. The only expection in
stabiliness was that "Problematic upgrade" (name of thread on this
list) of libpcsomething3.
On 29.03.2012 10:42, Lisi wrote:
> On Thursday 29 March 2012 06:51:30 Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>> Why not Sid?
>>
>> Lisi <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 27 March 2012 19:00:18 Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
>>> wrote:
>>>> I want it fast!
>>>
>>> Then use Ubuntu.
>
> I thought it possible that Ubuntu was nearer to the stability also
> required. Since I have only tried and not used both Sid and Ubuntu
> I would not take a stand on that. But I did consider it.
>
> Lisi
- --
Mika Suomalainen
> gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
> 4DB53CFE82A46728 Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65
> 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
>> NOTE: The old key (62FE66853913CB03) expires on 03.04.2012!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=7tMG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: