Re: packet loss after Lenny Squeeze upgrade
On 3/21/2012 11:00 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> All I know right now is when I send pings to the server from another server I get 1-5% packet loss. :-(
It's a requirement on a *technical* mailing list to provide technical
data related to a problem, not merely subjective statements, which is
all you have provided thus far. At *minimum* you should provide some
*evidence* of the problem. Such evidence may consist of, but not only,
ping and traceroute output in both directions, to/from the "problem
server", from multiple hosts on different switch/router segments within
your network and outside of it. We need to see your output, not just
comments, such as:
$ ping 217.114.99.194
PING 217.114.99.194 (217.114.99.194) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 217.114.99.194: icmp_req=1 ttl=47 time=163 ms
64 bytes from 217.114.99.194: icmp_req=2 ttl=47 time=172 ms
64 bytes from 217.114.99.194: icmp_req=3 ttl=47 time=185 ms
64 bytes from 217.114.99.194: icmp_req=4 ttl=47 time=177 ms
64 bytes from 217.114.99.194: icmp_req=5 ttl=47 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 217.114.99.194: icmp_req=6 ttl=47 time=165 ms
64 bytes from 217.114.99.194: icmp_req=7 ttl=47 time=146 ms
^C
--- 217.114.99.194 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6023ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 146.948/166.733/185.263/12.009 ms
$ traceroute -q 1 217.114.99.194
traceroute to 217.114.99.194 (217.114.99.194), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 smc.hardwarefreak.com (192.168.100.1) 0.883 ms
2 mo-65-41-216-193.sta.embarqhsd.net (65.41.216.193) 65.722 ms
3 mo-69-68-209-229.sta.embarqhsd.net (69.68.209.229) 66.578 ms
4 208-110-240-186.centurylink.net (208.110.240.186) 68.559 ms
5 bb-kscbmonr-jx9-01-ae0.core.centurytel.net (206.51.69.5) 75.374 ms
6 bb-dllstx37-[...].core.centurytel.net (206.51.69.25) 84.665 ms
7 dal-edge-18.inet.qwest.net (72.165.208.157) 85.815 ms
8 dap-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net (67.14.2.85) 85.794 ms
9 xe-8-1-0.edge2.dallas3.level3.net (4.68.63.49) 90.268 ms
10 vlan90.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.254) 92.403 ms
11 ae-83-83.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.158) 94.672 ms
12 ae-3-3.ebr2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.137.122) 124.038 ms
13 ae-63-63.ebr1.Atlanta2.Level3.net (4.69.148.242) 128.148 ms
14 ae-6-6.ebr1.Washington12.Level3.net (4.69.148.106) 126.386 ms
15 ae-1-100.ebr2.Washington12.Level3.net (4.69.143.214) 128.035 ms
16 4.69.148.49 (4.69.148.49) 132.929 ms
17 ae-58-223.csw2.Amsterdam1.Level3.net (4.69.153.210) 220.366 ms
18 ae-2-52.edge4.Amsterdam1.Level3.net (4.69.139.170) 185.791 ms
19 gi1-7.bg1.am1.eu.equinix.net (212.72.40.62) 188.672 ms
20 ae-2-52.edge4.Amsterdam1.Level3.net (4.69.139.170) 188.527 ms
21 ve85.l3c-en1-1.as16243.net (87.249.109.1) 200.309 ms
22 ve1.far4.as16243.net (77.222.66.126) 199.577 ms
23 ve85.l3c-en1-1.as16243.net (87.249.109.1) 192.612 ms
24 ve1.far4.as16243.net (77.222.66.126) 192.505 ms
25 *
26 *
27 *
28 *
29 *
30 *
--
Stan
Reply to: