[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[andreimpopescu@gmail.com: Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository)]



I think he wanted to CC'd so ...

----- Forwarded message from Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> -----

Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 01:28:15 +0200
From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository)

On Lu, 05 mar 12, 10:36:45, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> 
> I'm speaking about "testing" not "unstable". It used to be quite stable
> and works well for the last 5 years.
> Now, it is unstable in the sense that there are many critical bugs that
> were introduced recently.
> For me such regressions should remain in "sid" and not go into
> "testing".

Release critical bugs (RC) do stay in unstable, if they are found before 
the package automatically migrates to testing. Do you have some specific 
examples?

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic



----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet."
   -- Napoleon Bonaparte


Reply to: