Re: Networking Q concerning /etc/network/interfaces
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:08:11 +0000, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 12 Feb 2012 at 18:53:07 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:22:00 +0000, Brian wrote:
>> > It means ifupdown was able to configure eth0 because there is now an
>> > ethernet cable attached to it.
>> But Harry said there was no cable connected to that card :-?
> In the post you responded to there is:
> I have connected something to the other ethernet port now ... and so
> ifconfig -a reports (with me doing nothing special but having
> both have received a dns served address (the one ending 42 is hard
> coded at the router by MAC. The range 100-150 is left for misc).
Yes, I already read it but when he said "the other ethernet port" I
thought he was referring to "eth1", of course, because there's no mistery