Re: Why can't why have both GNOME 2 and GNOME 3?

To: Richard <richard.bown@blueyonder.co.uk>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why can't why have both GNOME 2 and GNOME 3?
From: Lorenzo Bandieri <lorenzo.bandieri@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:32:09 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] CABqumk88E-VU4Etg6UoGcYM-DzGEY+bY2KQ_n4hPe+A8+g6LrA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20111115160239.30d6a89b@debian>
References: <[🔎] 4EC2228A.5020206@familyross.net> <[🔎] CAOdo=Sxk9kHL67Z0TYGY+YP2bQmxduJQWbxAmp++1mZ42dE5dA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CABqumk8z=ycKT+L354WknPq4xKzJ5yRpW_qzVm8=U--d2L8dZg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20111115160239.30d6a89b@debian>

> You can make Gnome3-shell look as near as damn it like gnome2-shell

That's good news :)

> The only thing I haven't been able to do with 3 that i could do with 2 is right click
> on an app in the drop down menu to put a short cut of the app either on the desktop or the panel.
> And I haven't used any thing that wasn't in the debian repos.
> You are stuck with it , it wont go away.
> I hope the problem I had with gnome3-shell in fedora doesn't creep in to this distro.
>

I think that gnome 3 will get better with time.

Cheers,
Lorenzo

Reply to:

References:
- Why can't why have both GNOME 2 and GNOME 3?
  - From: Kevin Ross <kevin@familyross.net>
- Re: Why can't why have both GNOME 2 and GNOME 3?
  - From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
- Re: Why can't why have both GNOME 2 and GNOME 3?
  - From: Lorenzo Bandieri <lorenzo.bandieri@gmail.com>
- Re: Why can't why have both GNOME 2 and GNOME 3?
  - From: Richard <richard.bown@blueyonder.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Why can't why have both GNOME 2 and GNOME 3?
Next by Date: Skype - how to get the microphone test
Previous by thread: Re: Why can't why have both GNOME 2 and GNOME 3?
Next by thread: Re: Why can't why have both GNOME 2 and GNOME 3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread