I know you were talking about RHL, I was replying to Ismael.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:29:03PM GMT, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Raf Czlonka <email@example.com
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:12:01PM GMT, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
> >> To clarify things up (ok, a bit off topic):
> >> Red Hat Linux is a commercial distro, but what they sell is the supporte
> > To clarify things, Red Hat Linux _was_ a distro available as a free
> > download with or without commercial support.
> > What you are talking about is Red Hat _Enterprise_ Linux.
> Very true; "_was_" is the correct tense. But I was talking about RHL,
> the distribution that RH published before moving to a RHEL/Fedora