Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.

To: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
From: yudi v <yudi.tux@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:35:41 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] CACo--ms-PxqUL=0wksfDydY58M7txz_nJXncdhnn5Kh0xt5Uzw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20111017232735.5d7fd6bc15ebd6f34a52ae9c@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CACo--mvxN5Gr3=j3hS5bjzrc0iS3izPf6+B9ziRFrURXUu+PUQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20111017232735.5d7fd6bc15ebd6f34a52ae9c@gmail.com>

I see this, at least at startup. It's been reported here:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544651

Celejar

That's almost 2 yrs old. From the limited experience I have with this setup, I don't think this should cause any trouble what so ever.

I might generate a new initrd, after backing up the current one.
Haven't tried this before, cursory glance at the docs suggests this is not such a difficult task.

--
Kind regards,
Yudi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
  - From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>

References:
- LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
  - From: yudi v <yudi.tux@gmail.com>
- Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
  - From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
Next by Date: Re: posting
Previous by thread: Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
Next by thread: Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread