Re: Routing weird IPs
Le 15182ième jour après Epoch,
Paulo Santos écrivait:
> Hello list,
>
> We have an Asterisk PBX running on Debian with 1 NIC. We're adding a
> SIP trunk and, for that, the ISP/ITSP installed a router/gateway (I
> think that's what it is).
>
> They've told me I needed to have configuration like this:
[... some config details ...]
Please, re-check your mail, because of probably lot of typo errors...
> Plus this routes:
>
> 10.0.0.0 /255.0.0.0 - 10.120.43.158
> 62.48.163.64/255.224.0.0 - 10.200.34.158
> 192.168.168.0/255.255.255.192 - 10.120.43.158
If your syntax is "ip/mask - gateway", then the second line use a
gateway not in your ip range (10.200... vs 10.120...), or this is a typo
error.
> I also need the PBX be in the our network as well, 192.168.0.200. For
> that I created an alias and now I have my interfaces like this:
>
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.0.200
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> network 192.168.0.0
> broadcast 192.168.0.255
> gateway 192.168.0.254
>
> auto eth0:0
> iface eth0:0 inet static
> address 10.120.43.153
> netmask 255.255.255.248
> gateway 10.120.43.158
You can't have 2 gateway lines, because gateway is equiv to "route
default", and you can't have 2 default destinations.
> But when I try any of the other 2, I get:
>
> route: bogus netmask 255.225.255.192
> Usage: ...
Look at the "225" instead of "255" in the second byte of the netmask. Is
it a typo error?
Please use cut and paste of your commands and the results in your next
mail, to avoid errors and to permit a good diagnosis.
Reply to: