posting (was: Threading)
Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.productions@gmail.com> writes:
> On 22/06/11 21:53, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On 21/06/11 23:29, Camaleón wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:21:01 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>>>>> But at least you did not reply to a digest.
>>>>
>>>> Sure. I'd say digests are for reading more than replying.
>
> And I am in absolute agreement with you!
Hm, I wonder why anyone is going to the lengths of replying to digest
messages rather than just subscribing to the list ...
> But then - I also believe if someone top posts there *is* something
> wrong. Likewise posting in HTML. Or posting to the list because they are
> unable to do something, but then insisting on rudely declaring how
> something must be done (and still expecting respect).
Here or anywhere else, indeed. I´m seeing badly designed followups way
too often. Some people don´t even use quote marks so that it becomes
indistinguishable who says what or what someone is refering to. I wish
there was a way to automatically detect such followups to automatically
lower their scores and have them not displayed anymore.
Do you know of a good reference that teaches people how to post I could
point to in my signature?
Reply to: