Re: imapsync
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:35:53 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 21 Jun 2011 at 10:51:34 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> I can understand that the package is provided with a monetary cost (but
>> still open source). What I fail to see is why the author does not want
>> it to be distributed by anyone :-?
>
> He has never said that. Quite the opposite:
Ein?
> I repeat with precision "No. Do what you want". I promise I won't
> complain anymore about the fact imapsync is on Debian or not.
>
> And
>
> >> As far as I can see, the author of this software has even said in a
> >> message in this bug report that "You can even make [this software]
> >> a GPL software"[1], which I understand him to mean that the intent
> >> of the new license is to be GPL-compatible!
> >
> > You are reading very selectively.
>
> Jeff is reading right.
>
> (The final sentence is Gilles Lamiral's).
Great, but I've also read this (which is the reason why the packages was
removed):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#60
Maybe he didn't express it in the right way (!?), but now I'm afraid his
possition is not very clear...
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: