On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:37:49AM -0700, CACook@quantum-sci.com wrote: > On Wednesday 11 May, 2011 08:59:24 Aaron Toponce wrote: > > First, you're speculating. You have nothing to base your guess on. > > Microsoft may not have been the most "Linux-friendly" company in the world, > > but that doesn't mean that they are going to cut the GNU/Linux client of > > Skype. > > > > Second, http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/05/ballmer-skype-announcement/. > > Quote: > > > > Third, Skype is a proprietary client that uses a proprietary protocol. If > > you're that concerned about it, then you'll run it on a supported platform, > > even if it means the platform itself is proprietary, such as Microsoft > > Windows. > > LOL, what makes you think that wagging your finger at someone, teaches them anything, or encourages respect for you? Wagging my finger? What wagging? I put a quick stop to the spreading of FUD, gave support to back it up, and then explained that GNU/Linux users that are hell-bent on using Skype will use it elsewhere, should GNU/Linux support get dropped. I'm failing to see the "finger wagging". -- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature