On Wednesday 23 February 2011 01:23:42 Debian_bug_report wrote: > Well, I can't understand clearly what Sandro want to say, but I think that > he talks about the package has be defined like "reportbug", but I wanted to > say "other". There is no "other" in the Debian BTS. Each bug is attached to a specific package. There are a few "pseudo-packages" like "wnpp", but those are still specific. You can't just say "other"; if you haven't determined which package or pseudo-package to file against, you haven't done enough discovery on your issue for it to actually be a bug. The Debian BTS (really, most bug trackers) are not the "front-line" for user issues. > So he said that I should use this list... Which is a good idea. Many issues Debian users encounter are not bugs in the packages. Instead they are results of misconfiguration, misunderstanding, or just plain ignoring what the system already warned them about. > > My problem happen after I did the distro upgrade... I pass 2 months out > > of my > > debian distro, and I used the testing version (Squeeze), but I return > > yesterday > > to my debian distro and the Squeeze becomes stable... so I did the change > > to > > Debian testing again (now called Wheezy)... so I rename all my source > > packages > > like this source.list: > > > > #mirrors oficiais > > deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free > > deb-src http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free > > > > #mirrors de segurança > > deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free > > deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free > > > > #mirror multimídia > > deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian-multimedia/ testing main > > > > So, I went to my Lxterminal and type: "sudo aptitude update". After I > > type: > > "sudo aptitude safe-upgrade". What is the output of (aptitude search '~U')? What is the output of (aptitude search '~o')? Does (apt-get check) run to completion? None of your packages are in a half-configured or "unpacked, unconfigured" state are they? What about configuration file you shouldn't be using anymore, packages that own one or more of those will be shown in (aptitude search '~c'). > > I not use any login manager... I do my login in getty and > > after I start my X and window manager (fluxbox). So, when I restart my > > machine > > and try to start my X with the command "startx", I don't use this method, I use KDM. From what I understand, the X11 server needs to run as root otherwise it cannot access the hardware correctly. Hopefully, there are other on the list that are using this method of starting their X sessions. > > the system returns the > > error: > > "xinit: connection to X server lost" and after said "Wait for X server to > > shut > > down" and stayed with prompt flashing again. So, I tried invoke X with > > root > > and > > I had sucess! Sounds like the X11 server does need root access, to me. > > When I went to the .xsession-errors I saw this error: > > Xsession: X session started for invisiblemanguard at Ter Fev 22 16:36:02 > > BRT > > 2011 > > exec: 58: /usr: Permission denied > > > > Like the /usr couldn't be acess by a user... only root can... Output of (ls -ld /usr) might be helpful here, but I think you might be misinterpreting the error message. > > but I not > > change > > any priority of the system... I only updated to wheezy... that's it... Yeah, and sometimes upgrades require manual intervention. Debian tries to keep that minimal, but the release notes exist because we can't eliminate it entirely. Any of the issues that will appear in the Wheezy release notes would be issues that you (or testing user like you) encounter and document. > > sorry > > for my english... It's not my mother tongue =/ ;) It's not bad, IMO. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.