Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:20:36 -0800, kellyremo wrote:
Please, avoid sending messages with html format :-)
> My question is: So Why Does the original OpenSSH has "limited
> statically defined internal flow control buffers"?? It could be way
> faster, even 10x!!
> With the HPN-SCP path it could be the descendant of FTP! Why aren't
> there any ""OpenSCP packages""? ('normal SCP+HPN-SCP path+no local user
> needed for SCP'ing+chroot by default')
> Any opinions?
I wonder what OpenSSH upstream project thinks about that patch.