Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

[Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>]

On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:20:36 -0800, kellyremo wrote:

Please, avoid sending messages with html format :-)

> https://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/hpn-v-ssh-tput.jpg

(...)

http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/

>  My question is: So Why Does the original OpenSSH has "limited
>  statically defined internal flow control buffers"?? It could be way
>  faster, even 10x!!
>  
>  With the HPN-SCP path it could be the descendant of FTP! Why aren't
>  there any ""OpenSCP packages""? ('normal SCP+HPN-SCP path+no local user
>  needed for SCP'ing+chroot by default')
>  
>  Any opinions?

I wonder what OpenSSH upstream project thinks about that patch.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón