Re: Let's talk about HTTPS Everywhere
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:44:47 -0800
GaRaGeD Style <garaged@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes there is some, that's why load balancers use hardware chips for
> SSL protocol.
a) WPA[2] != SSL
b) We're discussing wireless networking, where there are usually (at
least at the consumer level) only a few clients connected to an AP.
Load balancers are presumably useful with large-scale commercial
applications.
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:00:12 +0000 (UTC)
> > Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> And WPA2 with AES encryption is considerably slow. There are also
> >> drawbacks when you enforce to use of the best encryption method.
> >
> > It is? Do you have either documentation, or personal experience, to
> > back this up, and to quantify the performance hit? I've never noticed
> > one, but I've not actually benchmarked.
> >
> > Celejar
> > --
> > foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
> > mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
> > ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > Archive: [🔎] 20110123232306.cffeb07b.celejar@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20110123232306.cffeb07b.celejar@gmail.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> $ echo "scale=1000000; 4*a(1)" | bc -l
Celejar
--
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
Reply to: