Re: being up to date (Was: insserv + apache2 + bind9 = pain)
On Wed January 5 2011 15:29:53 Arthur Machlas wrote:
> You keep asserting that 'years of DD work have been thrown away'. You
> do realise the ordering is still there, right? It's now in the LSB
> headers rather than the scripts numbering scheme.
That is not correct. The LSB header ordering is weaker and
causes many server failures, although it may be adequate for
simple laptop configurations.
The stable ordering is in fact in the postinst scripts.
Undoing the damage done by insserv is possible but non-trivial.